28 April 2006

go zoe!


For those who live in Philly: 
Dear Friends,
I have a great need for volunteers on the day of May 6th.

There are 2 big jobs that aren't covered...
I need folks who can help me sweep up potential puddles that form under the
highway around noon on the 6th. It looks like it might rain Thursday, Friday
and Saturday, which is ok except for the puddle issue.
And! Can photographers help document the event? There were some great
photos from last year but no hi-res ones. I would be so grateful for some
good hi res images.
Let me know!
And tell everyone you know to come!
With Love,
ZS
 
WHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOO.  GET READY, FOLKS.  I AM BRINGING IT THIS YEAR.


Zoe Strauss Photography Installation Under I-95

May 6, 2006

Photographer and installation artist Zoe Strauss will exhibit over 231 new
and selected works on Saturday, May 6th, 2006 from 1pm to 3pm under I-95 at
Front St. and Mifflin St. in South Philadelphia. The exhibition is free and
open to the public. Selected pieces of Ms. Strauss's art will be available
as color photocopies for purchase at 5 dollars each. The event will happen
rain or shine. It's going to be off the hook.

This is the 6th year of Ms. Strauss's ongoing 10-year photo installation in
South Philadelphia. Within the last 6 years Ms. Strauss has shown in the
2006 Whitney Biennial, been commissioned to create a ramp project at the
Philadelphia ICA, had 8 prints purchased by the Philadelphia Museum of Art
for their permanent collection,
received a Leeway grant and become a member of the Leeway advisory council,
shown a slideshow at the Philadelphia ICA and won "friends of Arcadia award"
for her piece in the Arcadia Works on Paper Show. Of all this fanciness,
the 95 show is really the big thing in Ms. Strauss's own opinion.

Zoe Strauss is the executive director of the Philadelphia Public Art Project

For more information on the May 1 exhibit or on the Philadelphia Public Art
Project please visit http://zoestrauss.com/
or
contact Zoe Strauss at
info@zoestrauss.com

don't forget monday

A National Day Without an Immigrant
Do what you can.

I saw a really good documentary last night, Crossing Arizona. It was amazingly, to its credit, unbiased, though I have to say the lines of good and evil were nevertheless clearly drawn for me. I guess because I don't own a television so don't get to see and hear these folks on a regular basis. I was fascinated to listen to anti-immigrationists speaking about their beliefs about borders, citizenship, and what they're "protecting" as their duty. It's truly fascinating how minds can work—on the surface they seem rational enough, but the views they espouse make my head spin. I can't understand these people. The most telling scene was showing an assembly of anti-immigrationists at an Arizona hotel and then interviewing the immigrant who was cleaning up after them talking about what they do. And the ones who go into the desert and cut open the water jugs? That's premeditated murder. How else could you view it? The man above, Mike Wilson: total hero.

if you live in n.j. (or n.y.)

Suzan-Lori Parks is brilliant and it certainly sounds topical, but I have to say it creeps me the fuck out to see the name Frist all over my alma mater. To see it anywhere, really.


The Black Arts Company: Drama proudly presents

The Death of the Last Black Man in the Whole Entire World

A Showcase Performance

Written by Suzan-Lori Parks
Directed by Kemati Porter*
Choreographed by Dyane Harvey**
Produced by Roger Q. Mason

Saturday, May 6, 2006
Performances at 3pm and 5pm

Frist Film and Performance Theatre, Princeton University
Princeton, NJ

Complimentary Tickets Available at Frist Box Office
Free Admission, but Ticket Stub Still required for Admission

*Courtesy of McCarter Theatre

**Lecturer in the Council of the Humanities and Theatre and Dance

27 April 2006

this makes me sad

(all images by Bayeté Ross Smith)

Now that I work in San Francisco I rarely get in my car to go anywhere. I like taking public transportation, even when the escalators are broken for weeks or there are too few trains for passengers so if your sitting down your face is pressed up too close to some stranger's sweaty crotch or they're late or any of the myriad of complaints one can lodge about one's municipal transit options. But I've noticed something time and again on the bus that I just have to comment upon.

Older Chinese people won't sit next to black folks.

It always (and only) happens on the bus through Chinatown. At first I thought it was the particular black folks, especially men, that older people, especially women, did not want to sit near. The first time I noticed it, the guy looked vaguely sketchy, though from my perspective he was certainly less frightening than the multitudes of yuppies I must walk among each day. I watched several elderly women get on the bus, look pointedly at him and the empty seat next to him, and opt to stand. Now, I'll readily give up my seat to an elderly person, and maybe they were all regulars on this route and they knew something about his potential behavior that I didn't, but something about the way in which each of these women looked at this man then clearly made the decision to stand made me uneasy. A week or so later I noticed it happened with a black woman. She, too, looked only vaguely sketchy; one by one older Chinese women got on the bus, looked at her and the empty seat next to her, and opted to stand. Again I thought, hmmm—trying to give these other people of color the benefit of the doubt—they sense something about that woman that just isn't right, but at the same time I'm thinking, wait a minute, I ain't stupid and this is not okay. I noticed it a few more times and then, inevitably, it happened to me, and even on my worst days I could not be construed as sketchy. Unattractive, maybe, style-challenged— but not sketchy. What's going on? I wanted to yell, we don't bite, people, and black don't rub off—what are you fucking afraid of? But, you know, in the moment you're just too shocked and disgusted to do anything.

But last night it happened again, and this time it really made me sad. There was a young black man sitting on the bus when I got on, and I sat two seats from him because the bus wasn't that crowded. Admittedly, brother smelled a little ripe, but he was quiet and respectful and minding his own. At the next stop a bunch of people got on, filling the bus, including a couple older women, and a man tried to beckon them toward us to take the available seats but the one woman didn't even want to come to that section of the bus. Seeing that they were older, I guess, that young man vacated his seat to stand (and then I could see the peace and anti-war patches on his backpack), and only then did they move (quickly) past him to occupy already-open seats near where he'd been. He was clearly attuned to the dynamic; otherwise he wouldn't have given up his seat. I wanted to cry.

sickening but not surprising

(I'm not sure what the original source is of this article for citation; there's a related article at http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/4/18/104520/931


Also, a NY times (registration required) article:http://tinyurl.com/na78q

Washington Post article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/03/AR2006040301699.html

And on this page from the Smithsonian Institution, you can find a link (dated 3/17)
to the announcement press release.
http://newsdesk.si.edu/


Go here to download a letter to send to Lawrence Small, the Secretary of
the Smithsonian Institution.

http://public.resource.org/sunshine_letter.pdf
Thanks to a secret, no-bid deal cut earlier this year, the complete terms of which they refuse to release, The
Smithsonian, the "Nation's Attic", has become Showtime's candy store instead.

As part of a near-exclusive deal with Showtime Networks, the Smithsonian Institution is restricting filmmakers' access to its scientists and archives. From now on, most filmmakers will not have in-depth use of Smithsonian materials unless they are creating work for the Smithsonian/Showtime unit.

This means, effectively, that $800 million a year in taxpayer funds we spend on the venerable institution has just become another form of corporate welfare.

To understand the utter outrage of this deal, you must first understand the incredible depth and breadth of the institution and its archives. First, the Smithsonian is not a single museum but 15 separate museums covering almost every imaginable subject from the famous Air and Space museum to the National Zoo to the newly-opened American Indian Museum. And even that only scratches the surface of what the Institution really is. The Institution's archives hold millions of historical documents, and photographs, miles of film (8 million feet in the anthropology archive alone), and thousands of hours of recordings that are unique and able to be found nowhere else in the world. And all of it, every last treasure, was just made off-limits without permission from the Smithsonian's corporate partner Showtime.

Or to quote noted firebrand documentarian Ken Burns:

"History's just been made for sale to an inside deal," said Ken Burns, the Emmy-winning producer of the documentaries "Baseball" and "The Civil War."

Or, to put it even more bluntly:

"I was horrified that the Smithsonian would even contemplate a deal that would give a for-profit broadcaster the right of first refusal," said Nina Gilden Seavey, an Emmy-winning filmmaker and director of the Documentary Center at George Washington University. "It is a fire sale of the nation's history."

It is important to understand the contract term "right of first refusal" and what it effectively does to anyone wishing access to the Smithsonian. Effectively it means that from now on anybody who wants to do ANYTHING about the Smithsonian, its collections, or even staff has to offer to sell Showtime the finished product.

Jeanny Kim, the vice president for media services at Smithsonian Business Ventures, said the filmmakers who were doing "more than an incidental treatment" of a subject mainly from Smithsonian materials or wishing to focus on a Smithsonian curator or scientist would first have to offer the idea to Smithsonian/Showtime. Otherwise, the archives could not be used.

Not only is this an outrageous enrichment of a private company at public expense, but it is literally allowing a corporation to spin our history as it sees fit. According to the deal, to get access to the archives, filmmakers MUST sell their final products to Showtime, if Showtime wishes to purchase them. However there are no controls on what Showtime does once the film is in their possession, or if they ever air it, and what edits they may choose to make before doing so. They are now free to spin pieces of the historical record any way they find convenient and no one can effectively rebut them. It almost goes without saying that this is an unbelievably dangerous idea.

Worse yet, Showtime is a only a tiny part of the communications giant Viacom. Viacom's other holdings include: CBS, dozens of local TV and radio stations , 20 different cable channels (including MTV and all its demon-spawn), Simon and Schuster publishers, King World Distributors, etc. and it would be utterly naive to believe that they have no plans for leveraging their access to the Smithsonian's collections for corporate synergy purposes. Those things they find helpful or profitable can be promoted and those they find unhelpful can be suppressed (for example inconvenient historical records that contradict a Blockbuster Biopic made by Paramount, might never see the light of day if Viacom decided releasing them would hurt the box office gross).

We have fought hard to save other national treasures like ANWAR, and staked out the principle that sacrificing our natural heritage for short term corporate profits was a bad idea.

That principle has NEVER been more imperiled than by this back room, still-secret deal that effectively turns over millions of unique and irreplaceable historical records, knowledge and artifacts to a giant entertainment company. If you stood up for ANWAR it's time to stand again and not let a giant mega-corporation take sole ownership of your History.

26 April 2006

if you live in l.a.

(and because the LA Times makes you register)

Absences make her art stronger

Lorna Simpson's portraits have a fresh point of view.

By Hugh Hart
Special to The Times

April 17, 2006

Framed on the gallery walls in precise grids and rows are images of wigs and hairdos, mouths and necks, the backs of heads, or torsos. Many are pictures of women, African Americans who have turned their backs to the camera. Notably absent from these photographic works by artist Lorna Simpson is the direct gaze of a human face.

To hear Simpson tell it as she finishes installing the midcareer survey of her work at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles, producing a conventional portrait would amount to taking the easy way out.

"Portraiture doesn't necessarily have to correlate to having this facial expression where there's a reciprocal gaze, as though you know something about the subjects because you can gaze into their eyes," she says a few days before the show's opening. "The strategy in my work has been to kind of depersonalize that a little bit. By eliminating that quiet gaze back and forth, it gets the viewer to question, 'Well then, who is the subject?' "

Brooklyn-based Simpson's own gaze is steady, and she laughs easily as she revisits images that document her creative evolution since 1985. The exhibition, organized by the American Federation of Arts and curated by AFA adjunct curator Helaine Posner, encompasses image and text pieces, photographs on felt, film and video installations and a series of silhouetted profiles framed in the style of turn-of-the-century daguerreotypes. The show continues at MOCA through July 10, then travels to the Miami Art Museum, New York's Whitney Museum of American Art and other venues.

Simpson, 45, recently was named a 2006 Alphonse Fletcher Sr. fellow for work contributing to improving race relations in U.S. society and furthering the goals of the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision. It was early in her career, however, that she began using words as a way to tease viewers into a deeper engagement with her images.

Pausing in front of "Stereo Styles" (1988), which features 10 Polaroid prints depicting the back of a woman's head dressed in a variety of hairstyles, Simpson notes the perky adjectives — "Daring," "Country Fresh," "Long & Silky" — that accompany the images.

"The text is basically ad copy for women's hair products," she says, "so the work is about that absurdity and how much it's a part of the language of the world we live in."

She crosses the gallery to "Twenty Questions (A Sampler)" (1986), a series of four identical photographs of the back of a woman's head, also accompanied by text: "Is she as pretty as a picture ... or black as coal."

"This is a refusal on my part to provide some monolithic identity, particularly an African American or black identity," Simpson says. "All this repetition and reproduction that photography affords can become part of the structure of the pieces. Maybe I am trying to get away from the personalization or the specialty of one single, rarefied image."

Huey Copeland, an assistant professor of art history at Northwestern University, has written about Simpson's work and will moderate "Down for Whatever: A Roundtable on the Current States of African American Art" on June 10 at MOCA in conjunction with the exhibition.

"Lorna is not simply giving you this easy image of the body," he says. "Her work is giving you an abstract image of the body that has been, in a sense, surgically cut by the lines of the frame. The figure is like a trope, a figure of speech that can be turned in a way that it opens the work up to a variety of different perspectives and visions. At the same time, she keeps it rooted in the particular, which of course is what great art always does."

Simpson had arrived at her essentially nondocumentary approach to photography by her mid-20s. An only child raised in New York by parents she describes as exceptionally arts-friendly political activists, she created accomplished but relatively straightforward photographic work during her years at the School of Visual Arts in New York, where she received a bachelor's degree in photography. She arrived at UC San Diego in 1982, a 22-year-old master of fine arts student hankering for new direction.

"When I left New York, I'd already shown, done a lot of traveling, produced a lot of work and had actually gotten kind of bored with it because I felt I had kind of exhausted my skills," she says. "San Diego to me represented more of a conceptual art approach and really had an impact on me, because I definitely wanted to think about photography in different ways."

Simpson returned to New York in 1985 and began creating the signature pieces that challenge viewers to forge their own connections between words and images.

In 1997, she moved beyond the duplicate photographic groupings and mural pieces and began making films and video installations. They include "Easy to Remember" (2001), a grid of projected images depicting 15 pairs of lips humming wildly varied renditions of the Rodgers and Hart song "It's Easy to Remember" as recorded by jazz great John Coltrane.

Another video installation, "31" (2002), simultaneously portrays a month in a woman's daily routine on 31 video panels patterned on the wall seven across to suggest a calendar. Her "Corridor" video (2003) presents side-by-side vignettes detailing the daily routine of a Civil War-era runaway slave paralleled by a bored black housewife, equally isolated, as Simpson puts it, "by the trappings of upper-middle-class domestic life."

MOCA curatorial associate Rebecca Morse, who worked on the exhibition with Posner, says, "It seems that what Lorna Simpson is always asking you to do, as the viewer, is to make comparisons, to look from one frame to the next frame, whether it's down a line of still images, or overlapping in the film work within one contained space."

Throughout the several phases of her career and regardless of media or ostensible subject matter, Simpson acknowledges that her work inevitably embodies issues of race and gender.

"The spectacle of the black figure takes up a lot of space within artistic practice," she says.

"But that has more to do with the culture that we live in. There is no way, really, to depoliticize race."

'Lorna Simpson'

Where: Museum of Contemporary Art, 250 S. Grand Ave., Los Angeles

When: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Mondays and Fridays, 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. Thursdays, 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays. Closed Tuesdays and Wednesdays.

Ends: July 10

Price: $5 to $8

Contact: (213) 626-6222; www.moca.org

'nuff said

25 April 2006

getting money to give money


So Deirdre and I have started an artist's grant. We're soliciting $10 donations from good and kind people to give away to artists. We accept all methods of payments. So far we have $85 and we haven't fully debuted it yet (though now I have!). Go to http://carlagirl.net/cadre/cadreartgrant.html

24 April 2006

damn you, Myra!


Or thank you, I'm not sure which one. I was going to resist delving into this blog, but of course I can't:

http://www.jmcolberg.com/weblog/

And thank you, Jörg the astrophysicist, for having a lot of time on your hands, too.

can you pyknic?

I work on the 38th floor of an office building so am daily "captivated" by a video monitor that plays in the elevator. It offers up all kinds of useful, deliberately pleasant and non-confrontational information, like the local (yea, it's going to rain tomorrow!) and national weather, news headlines from reliable sources like USA Today, and knowledge-enriching tidbits like today's word of the day, pyknic. Can you guess?

(ADJ.) PIK'-NIK - having a short, stocky physique

The pyknic man was unable to qualify for the marathon.
If only I could be a fly on the proverbial wall of every encounter that takes place within the first couple of days after these mini-educations; I'd love to know how often this new vocabulary gets worked into casual conversation. I truly am interested in language and usage and how few words are in circulation at any given time. I remember reading a story years ago about a town where the residents only had vocabularies of about 300 words, and also about how the vocabulary in college students' papers was becoming increasingly limited to the offerings in the Microsoft Word thesaurus. Really, I'd love to just overhear some eager person using one of our new words. I'd know we were part of the same world of elevator education. After all, you gotta take your perks where you get 'em.

As you can see, I'm trying to make the best of my current situation. As I make coffee and photocopy and try to decide whether to get my shoes repaired, I'm trying not to go here:

Because here is bad.

21 April 2006

sublimity

Lila Downs bringing the noise last night at the Fillmore; Colson Whitehead reading at Stacey's this afternoon. Happy sigh.

20 April 2006

one of the best blogs i've ever read




Confessions of a Restroom Attendant. Seriously, I've just read the whole thing. It's really compelling. I think I've figured out which restaurant this is. I've been there.

19 April 2006

this is so, so important

I've had friends tell me my site was blocked from a particular computer they were using, whether at work or elsewhere, for content. We take it for granted that just because we're uploaded we're accessible, but that's not the case now and it could definitely get worse. Please sign this, call your congressperson, do whatever you can. We are so far from "free," whatever that means, in this country it's not even a joke. This country is based on "paydom," not freedom.

Congress is on the verge of pushing through a radical law that gives giant corporations more control over the Internet.

Internet providers like AT&T and Verizon are lobbying Congress hard to gut Network Neutrality, the principle that preserves the free and open Internet. These Internet providers would then be allowed to use their gatekeeper role to favor websites that pay what amounts to protection money—steering Internet users and online consumers in that direction.

Those who couldn't pay would have their web content marginalized—diminishing the voice and choice that everyday Americans have online. This strikes at the heart of what MoveOn believes in: The Internet is a revolutionary force for democratic participation, economic innovation, and free speech specifically because it has leveled the playing field for the little guy. That is now at risk.

We need to act now. Can you sign this petition to your member of Congress asking him or her not to ruin the Internet? Click here:

http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/?id=7336-170057-B4HwE.JJgqmDv.nYZrp14g&t=4

Then, please forward this to a friend. As detailed below, protecting Network Neutrality affects nearly everyone—online activists, Google users, Ipod listeners, work-at-home parents, small businesses, economic innovators, and others.

Those who sign this petition will be kept informed of how we can keep the heat on Congress—and which members of Congress are voting the wrong way.

We've already seen what happens when companies who serve as gatekeepers to the Internet abuse their power. Just last week, AOL blocked any email that mentioned a coalition of 600 organizations that MoveOn is a part of, formed to oppose AOL's proposed "email tax."1 Last year, Canada's version of AT&T—Telus—blocked their Internet customers from visiting a Web site sympathetic to the local union during a contentious labor dispute.2

Politicians don't think we are paying attention to this issue. Many of them take campaign checks from big telecom companies and are on the verge of selling out to people like AT&T's CEO, who openly says, "The internet can't be free."3

The time to act is now—can you sign this petition letting your member of Congress know the public supports preserving the free and open Internet? Click here:

http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/?id=7336-170057-B4HwE.JJgqmDv.nYZrp14g&t=5

Please forward to others who care about this issue. Thanks for all you do.

–Eli Pariser, Adam Green, Noah T. Winer, and the MoveOn.org Civic Action team
Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

P.S. If Congress abandons Network Neutrality, who will be affected?
  • Advocacy groups like MoveOn—Political organizing could be slowed by a handful of dominant Internet providers who ask advocacy groups to pay "protection money" for their websites and online features to work correctly.
  • Nonprofits—A charity's website could open at snail-speed, and online contributions could grind to a halt, if nonprofits can't pay dominant Internet providers for access to "the fast lane" of Internet service.
  • Google users—Another search engine could pay dominant Internet providers like AT&T to guarantee the competing search engine opens faster than Google on your computer.
  • Innovators with the "next big idea"—Startups and entrepreneurs will be muscled out of the marketplace by big corporations that pay Internet providers for dominant placing on the Web. The little guy will be left in the "slow lane" with inferior Internet service, unable to compete.
  • Ipod listeners—A company like Comcast could slow access to iTunes, steering you to a higher-priced music service that it owned.
  • Online purchasers—Companies could pay Internet providers to guarantee their online sales process faster than competitors with lower prices—distorting your choice as a consumer.
  • Small businesses and tele-commuters—When Internet companies like AT&T favor their own services, you won't be able to choose more affordable providers for online video, teleconferencing, Internet phone calls, and software that connects your home computer to your office.
  • Parents and retirees—Your choices as a consumer could be controlled by your Internet provider, steering you to their preferred services for online banking, health care information, sending photos, planning vacations, etc.
  • Bloggers—Costs will skyrocket to post and share video and audio clips—silencing citizen journalists and putting more power in the hands of a few corporate-owned media outlets.

To sign the petition to Congress supporting "network neutrality," click here:
http://www.civic.moveon.org/save_the_internet/?id=7336-170057-B4HwE.JJgqmDv.nYZrp14g&t=6

P.P.S. This excerpt from the New Yorker really sums up this issue well.

In the first decades of the twentieth century, as a national telephone network spread across the United States, A.T. & T. adopted a policy of "tiered access" for businesses. Companies that paid an extra fee got better service: their customers' calls went through immediately, were rarely disconnected, and sounded crystal-clear. Those who didn't pony up had a harder time making calls out, and people calling them sometimes got an "all circuits busy" response. Over time, customers gravitated toward the higher-tier companies and away from the ones that were more difficult to reach. In effect, A.T. & T.'s policy turned it into a corporate kingmaker.

If you've never heard about this bit of business history, there's a good reason: it never happened. Instead, A.T. & T. had to abide by a "common carriage" rule: it provided the same quality of service to all, and could not favor one customer over another. But, while "tiered access" never influenced the spread of the telephone network, it is becoming a major issue in the evolution of the Internet.

Until recently, companies that provided Internet access followed a de-facto commoncarriage rule, usually called "network neutrality," which meant that all Web sites got equal treatment. Network neutrality was considered so fundamental to the success of the Net that Michael Powell, when he was chairman of the F.C.C., described it as one of the basic rules of "Internet freedom." In the past few months, though, companies like A.T. & T. and BellSouth have been trying to scuttle it. In the future, Web sites that pay extra to providers could receive what BellSouth recently called "special treatment," and those that don't could end up in the slow lane. One day, BellSouth customers may find that, say, NBC.com loads a lot faster than YouTube.com, and that the sites BellSouth favors just seem to run more smoothly. Tiered access will turn the providers into Internet gatekeepers.4

Sources:

1. "AOL Blocks Critics' E-Mails," Los Angeles Times, April 14, 2006
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=1649

2. "B.C. Civil Liberties Association Denounces Blocking of Website by Telus," British Columbia Civil Liberties Association Statement, July 27, 2005
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=1650

3. "At SBC, It's All About 'Scale and Scope," BusinessWeek, November 7, 2002
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=1648

4. "Net Losses," New Yorker, March 20, 2006
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=1646

5. "Don't undercut Internet access," San Francisco Chronicle editorial, April 17, 2006
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=1645

18 April 2006

aw hells no!

Check out Thomas Hawk's rather on-point post on this ridiculous work in which the photographer states, “I manipulate my subjects to evoke an emotion to illustrate my personal beliefs."

"I had to learn the hard way that they had to be no older than three because beyond that they just don't cry so easily," Greenberg explains. "At that age, one needs to merely give them a lollipop and then take it away, et voila - pain and agony."

I mean, is she kidding? She says, "“I love the raw emotion of children, because it comes close to the anger and helplessness I feel about our current political and social situation.”" Man, folks will do anything to make a buck, especially in the name of so-called art. Like that means something. It's like the great catch-all excuse for doing dumb shit. Somebody slap that photographer and her dealer. And them kids' parents.

This whole issue of ethics reminds me of work I recently saw by Barbara DeGenevieve, in which she solicited male panhandlers for nude portraits. She apparently paid them each $100; read more about it here. Rather disappointing from her; I've generally liked her work but I gotta say, Barbara, what's up with this? I don't even know what to say about this notion of artists exploiting other people to work through their own issues. Why is this considered okay?

noooooooooooooooo!!

I love this site. Help keep it alive!


BC is in Dire Straits
Without more help, we will go under

In four years of operations, BlackCommentator.com has become the most influential Black political magazine on or off the Internet. We have achieved much of our social mission: to help shape and frame the dialogue, first, within the African American polity and, secondly, between African Americans and their non-Black allies.

We have attempted to draw “bright lines” of political behavior, so that Black politics can be based on the progressive principles embodied in the historical Black Consensus, forged over generations of struggle, rather than the pull of individual personalities or the malignant influence of corporate media and money. If there is to be struggle, there must be discipline and high standards of conduct for those who purport to represent and lead the people. That’s the job of the nearly extinct profession, journalism. A people without organs of discourse are naked to outside forces that conspire against them, and to their collaborators, within. BC is a critical element of our people’s armor during these dangerous times.

By drawing bright lines and illuminating issues, BC has made an important contribution to Black unity around those principles most important to the masses of our people: social and economic justice, human equality, and peace. We have resisted the diversions and traps set by those who would keep humanity’s eyes off the prize: a new and better world. We have refused to confine ourselves to the narrow parameters of analysis that previously defined “Black” issues, and instead offered an African American worldview of planetary affairs. If a people are to be truly free, they must claim the world and all of human history, as their own patrimony.

BC has on many occasions stopped treachery in its tracks, by blowing the whistle before the crime was consummated. Our very presence has acted as a warning to those who would deal away the fruits of our people’s toil and blood. When necessary, we have often been the sole source of indictment of those who have broken sacred covenants to make common cause with the enemy.

We are proud of our work. At times, it seems we may have done our job too well; it appears that many readers believe BC employs a large staff, operating on a comfortable budget. But in fact, a small staff has run this righteous machine on personal funds for four years, and has finally hit the wall. Unless those of you who value the mission to which we are all committed pay for the value you find in BC, we will be forced to cease publication. It’s that simple. We have committed 46 issues to our BC Paid Subscribers, and we will stick to that commitment, but those of you who have enjoyed and gained so much for free from BlackCommentator.com, it’s time to step up and support the work.

We do not seek corporate money. Our continued existence depends on you, the readership. Naturally, we ask that you become a BC Paid Subscriber, but we also request that you become a BC Contributor by giving beyond the minimum, as we have given our maximum to this crucial mission. We appreciate the generosity of those of you who have already purchased a subscription, and those who have gone further to become BC Contributors.

Now we have opened the BC Store, where you can purchase lots of hip stuff. You’ll find the Wal-mart Monster, MLK Let Freedom Ring and The Poisoned Tree posters and cards with the art of BC’s 29. There are mugs, T-shirts, caps, etc. with the BC logo, and Speaking Truth to Power. Every purchase you make helps support BlackCommentator.com. You’ll find ads linking to the BC Store all over our Website.

As the classic rap song said, “It makes me wonder how I keep from going under.” Only our readership can keep BlackCommentator.com from going under. We trust you won’t let that happen.

In Struggle,

Glen Ford and Peter Gamble, Publishers

BlackCommentator.com

Printer Friendly Version of article

just...sickening

Black German fights for life after attack

POTSDAM, Germany, April 18 (UPI) -- A German man of African origin is fighting for his life after being brutally beaten up by Neo-Nazis.

Although the police have no official leads on the horrific Easter morning attack in Potsdam, in the state of Brandenburg, near Berlin, observers expect the perpetrators to have come from the city's Neo-Nazi scene.

The victim, a 37-year-old engineer of Ethiopian descent, is in intensive care after he was kicked in the head by at least two people. Doctors have placed him in an artificial coma to reduce the swelling on his brain. His condition is being described as critical, according to Deutsche Welle Online.

The most important clue is a telephone call the victim made to his German wife's answering machine, where the attackers can be heard shouting 'dirty nigger' while the victim pleads with them to stop.

Potsdam officials said the incident is isolated and not part of a trend of growing racism in the region.

Brandenburg's Interior Minister Joerg Schoenbohm said there would be strong penalties for the attempted murder.

"In this country we do not tolerate that extremists chase, beat up or even murder people because of their skin color, religion or political positions," he said at a news conference Monday.

© Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved



STUDENT MURDER IN RUSSIA 'RACIST'

A Senegalese student has been killed by unidentified gunmen in the Russian city of St Petersburg, in what police believe is a racially-motivated attack.
Lamzar Samba was shot as he and his friends left a night club in the centre of Russia's second-largest city.

It is the latest in a wave of recent attacks in the city on foreigners and members of ethnic minorities.

A nine-year-old girl of mixed Russian and Malian parentage was seriously injured in a stabbing in March.

Last week, a teenager was acquitted of stabbing a nine-year-old Tajik girl to death in 2004.


Swastika sign

The attack on a group of African students took place early on Friday on the 5th Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, police in St Petersburg said.

They said the murder was racially-motivated, after finding a shotgun with a swastika sign on it near the scene of the attack.

Desire Defait, head of St Petersburg's African Unity organisation, said the assailants opened fire on the group of about six after they left the club.

"As a result, one of them fell and it turned out he (Lamzar Samba) was dead. The attacker shot from behind and no-one saw how many there were," Mr Defait told the AFP news agency.

Lamzar Samba had been studying in St Petersburg's telecommunications institute.

The city has recently seen an increase in violent attacks on foreigners and members of ethnic minorities.

On 25 March, the nine-year-old girl of Russian and Malian parentage was seriously injured in a stabbing attack, which prosecutors believe was racially-motivated.

Last December, a Cameroonian student was stabbed to death and a Kenyan national was wounded in attacks across St Petersburg.

Racist violence is seen in Russia as a growing problem by many human rights groups.

According to figures from the Moscow Bureau of Human Rights, there were 25 fatal racial attacks in Russia in 2005.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/4886298.stm

Published: 2006/04/07 09:13:24 GMT

© BBC MMVI

obviously, i need to get religion


“My God is a God who wants me to have things,” Mary J. Blige tells May’s Blender magazine. “He wants me to bling. He wants me to be the hottest thing on the block. I don’t know what kind of God the rest of y’all are serving, but the God I serve says, ‘Mary, you need to be the hottest thing this year, and I’m gonna make sure you’re doing that’.”

17 April 2006

disrupt something May 1, 2006: National Boycott for Immigrant Rights

Congrats!

Sheila Pree Bright Wins Santa Fe Prize

April 12, 2006
By Daryl Lang

Sheila Pree Bright has been awarded the 2006 Santa Fe Prize for
Photography for her work documenting African-American life in the
suburbs.

The Santa Fe Center for Photography announced the award yesterday,
along with five finalists. Pree Bright, who lives in Atlanta, will
receive $5,000 and acceptance in Review Santa Fe portfolio review
conference.

Pree Bright's work was selected by juror Chris Pichler, publisher of
Nazraeli Press, who describes the pictures as "intelligent, thoughtful
and authentic."

"While they counter mainstream media representation of
African-American culture in the 21st century, these photographs are so
beautiful in their own right - masterfully composed, elegantly lit, saturated nearly
to the point of liquidity - that they are as
interesting visually as they are conceptually,"
Pichler says in a
juror statement.

Pree Bright says she set out to show a side of African-American life that is seldom seen in popular culture.

"In the media we always see the projected images of hip-hop; celebrities in the ghetto," she says. "I always thought the
African-American middle class was invisible."

Pree Bright graduated with an MFA in photography from Georgia State University in 2003. Her photos have been shown in group
and individual
exhibitions and have been published in books, and she is participating in the upcoming Atlanta Celebrates
Photography festival. She says she
plans to continue her current work and also focus on other ethic minorities in suburbia.

"I started with African-American culture first because that's what I know and that's what I am," she says.

The prize is designed to bring light to a new body of work. Nominations are made anonymously by curators, editors, publishers and
educators.

http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/
mailto:dlang@pdnonline.com

Santa Fe Center for Photography
http://www.sfcp.org


Find this article at:
http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/newswire/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=3D=1002342902

11 April 2006

from the folks who brought you the weekend


Now, I don't pretend to understand everything (or anything) about unions, but how can striking be punishable with jail time? As the kids say, what in the crispy hell??? I know that the NY transit strike in December probably most negatively affected the working poor, but it's like having to compensate the big bosses for having some rights. Something not right.

09 April 2006

"Art gives you what life doesn't"

--Joel Sternfeld

Friday night we went to hear Joel Sternfeld give a lecture. He's one of both of our favorite photographers, and when I caught a glimpse of him beforehand, looking like the resplendently coiffed lovechild of Phil Spector and Bert Lahr, I was enthralled. Though I heard him speak once before as an undergraduate and remembered it fondly, I was nevertheless nervous that someone we held in such high esteem might turn out to be an awful speaker or worse, a jerk.




I had nothing to worry about.

"I love him more than ever," Deirdre scribbled to me about 3/4 of the way into the lecture. I concurred. He was fantastically self-deprecating, funny, yet terrifically sincere, covering the 30+ years of his photography by, he said, glossing over the highlights to focus on less well known work, much of which we probably hadn't seen. I thought I knew his work, but was pleasantly surprised to find that, indeed, there were several projects about which I knew nothing, such as Walking the High Line, Hart Island, and Treading on Kings: Protesting the G8 in Genoa, works with decidedly environmental and political content. Though I'd long known and been inspired by On This Site: Landscape in Memoriam (at left, the crime scene of Mount Rushmore), I hadn't really realized the degree to which Sternfeld's work was waging a quiet war against a myriad of injustices, but I was thrilled to see that not only did his politics agree with mine, but he was able to successfully use photography as a fine art to address larger social, environmental, and political issues.

But it was in his discussion of his most recent work, When it Changed (to be published by Steidl in the fall), that his humanity and artistry interwove to create—oh, hell, I hate weaving metaphors. Aren't they ridiculous? Blech. Anyway, Sternfeld attended the 2005 United Nations Climate Change conference in Montreal, and there he made a series of simple portraits of international representatives photographed right at the moment they were receiving some particularly devastating piece of information. I wish I could find some of them on the web to post here, but they are a collective portrait of shock, pain, defeat, hopelessness, weariness, and dread. Powerful stuff.

"Picture an ideal world and photograph that," was the advice the 99-year old activist Scott Nearing gave Sternfeld upon meeting the photographer and being shown his American Prospects book, which Nearing didn't like for being too critical of America. The first question in the Q&A after the lecture was someone who asked if Sternfeld agreed that in order to be a good photographer one had to be a "good guy." Sternfeld answered thoughtfully and passionately about the urgency of our times, particularly with regard to the environment, and the notion that perhaps being a good guy was not the thing to aspire to in the face of such seemingly insurmountable odds. He acknowledged the limitations of his choice of fine art photography as his chosen mode of communication, not least of which was the fact that photography has been one of the worst environmental polluters there is. It was an answer to end upon, I mean, what could you really ask him after that which would be more meaningful, but predictably, the final persistently waving hand had the last word: "What format camera do you use? Have you ever used digital?" Going from the sublime to the ridiculous, his response was far more gracious than mine would have been.

06 April 2006

aw, he misses slavery



"We do not need more people from foreign countries coming in and taking American jobs - even jobs in the fields," he said. "I say, let prisoners pick the fruits. Let's not bid down the wages of American workers."--Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach

viva pink & indigo


I do love me some Pink--not her music necessarily, just her. She's one of the very few young vastly popular artists with some kind of conscience (I'm ignoring, for the moment, her purported desire to open a string of strip clubs). Apparently her song "Dear Mr. President" features Indigo Girls. And you all know I love me some them. Apparently you can listen to the song here.

Okay, and I think she's bonkers, but I love the title of Peaches' new album: Impeach My Bush.

the story that won't end

More on the Duke Lacrosse team rape story:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0405061duke1.html

To think these are the people you walk among, probably work for. I think about that all the time down here in the financial district in San Francisco. I look at these arrogant young men and I think, these are my enemies; be wary of them. They're the most frightening demographic to me, bar none.

04 April 2006

good riddens

Image from http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives/006674.html, a great place to waste a lot of time on the web

"So many minority youths had volunteered…that there was literally no room for patriotic folks like myself." - Tom DeLay, explaining why he didn't fight in Vietnam

(Definitely click the title above. There're lots of gems, especially the Michael Scanlon quote.)

the most interesting thing so far this week


"During the '70s, Los Angeles had the largest Indian population in the U.S."

I love Cecilia Fire Thunder. And not just because she has the best name.

Click the title above for an interview with her.

Click the links below to make donations to her Planned Parenthood clinic in South Dakota:

http://bitchphd.blogspot.com/2006/03/heroine-of-week.html

http://kathrynt.livejournal.com/366823.html

03 April 2006

the most interesting thing i learned last week


That there are Vietnam war reenactors. I mean, really, who knew? You can't make this stuff up (click on the link above). Check out photographer An-my Lê's work and her publication, Small Wars.

Also, big ups to Laylah Amatullah Barrayn, who is featured in the May Upscale magazine (pages 84-85). The newsstand downstairs doesn't have it yet but congrats, Laylah!