31 January 2007

to buy or not to buy?

A Life Exposed


Published: January 14, 2007

Wandering through the London area of St. James’s Square today, past the old-boys’ clubs like Boodle’s and White’s, and the grim palace that Prince Charles once called home, it’s hard to imagine that in the last years of King George III’s reign carnivals of human curiosities existed side by side with these bastions of English aristocracy. But late Georgian Piccadilly — London’s most fashionable district since the Restoration — was as much a place for shows featuring “the Living Skeleton” and the 19-inch “Sicilian Fairy” as it was for members of Parliament, playwrights and self-styled gentlemen. Properly top-hatted and shawled, men and women of Britain’s upper crust gawked at, prodded and squeezed these so-called human freaks, amusing themselves with the deformities that were paraded before them.


City of Westminster Archive Center, London/Bridgeman Art Library

“Sartjee, the Hottentot Venus, Now Exhibiting in London, Drawn From Life,” read the caption on this engraving, circa 1810.

AFRICAN QUEEN

The Real Life of the Hottentot Venus.

By Rachel Holmes.

Illustrated. 161 pp. Random House. $23.95.


The Hottentot Venus, with buttocks of enormous size and with genitalia fabled to be equally disproportionate, was part of this human menagerie. When she arrived in London in 1810, this young woman from South Africa became an overnight sensation in London’s theater of human oddities. Her body was the object of prurient gaze, scientific fascination and disturbed bewilderment. Today, in the hands of Rachel Holmes, a former English professor at the University of London, it is “a symbol of the alienation and degradations of colonization, lost children, exile, the expropriation of female labor and the sexual and economic exploitation of black women by men, white and black.”

It is difficult not to be propelled through “African Queen.” The story of Saartjie Baartman — the Hottentot Venus’s real name — is inherently fascinating, and littered with a diverse cast of highly unlikable characters, ranging from Baartman’s lowly black South African master, Hendrik Cesars, to the foremost European scientist of the day, Georges Léopold Chrétien Cuvier. For Holmes, Baartman’s journey as an object of European curiosity and African exploitation began on the veld of South Africa’s Eastern Cape. It was there that Baartman, scarcely more than a teenager, was left both orphaned and widowed after a European-led commando ambushed her betrothal celebration, killing her father and husband. She was taken to Cape Town where she worked for Cesars and his wife as a house servant and wet nurse. Eventually, Cesars and Alexander Dunlop, a British military doctor, smuggled her into England in hopes that her oversized posterior would make their fortune.

Baartman was thrust onto the stage in Piccadilly, in a skintight, flesh-colored get-up, complete with a panoply of African beads and ostrich feathers. Baartman’s seminaked display left little to the imagination and reinforced England’s obsession with bottoms, both literally and figuratively. (The political scene was rife with speculation over whether Lord Grenville, known for his extraordinary derrière, and his Whig coalition, known as the broad bottoms, would take over Parliament if George III abdicated.) Baartman’s arrival was, as Holmes points out, “a journalist’s dream.” She goes on to observe that “the obsession with Saartjie’s posterior, posterity and broad bottomedness, and the endless punning on rear ends, rumps, fundaments and fat arses became explicitly tied to the most pressing and topical political issues concerning the decline of King George, the rise of the Regency and which rumps would take over government.”

Her economic exploitation also became the cause célèbre of abolitionists in London, who unsuccessfully lodged a case for Baartman’s freedom. But the young woman had limited choices: a return to South Africa, where surely she would have resumed a life of servitude, or continued exploitation in England, where she at least received a small wage and a modicum of freedom. Baartman, it seemed, preferred the latter, though the option was palatable only if swallowed with a healthy dose of alcohol, something that became an addiction as her years wore on.

Eventually, the Hottentot Venus’s journey took her to France, where Cesars handed her over to a “predatory showman” named Réaux in an undisclosed deal. By the spring of 1815, she had become the object of Cuvier’s scientific and sexual interest and, with her death in December of that year, was made the subject of a gruesome, hypersexual post-mortem dissection under the famed scientist’s knife.

At pains to place Baartman’s behavior and life in a framework of feminist and psychoanalytic interpretation, Holmes presents a narrative overladen with theory, however deftly disguised. This approach does more to undermine than strengthen the story. Holmes’s preoccupation with Baartman’s relationships to paternalistic figures, for instance, stands in the way of a fuller understanding of the European world in which the young South African maneuvered. True, we get into the minds of a few key characters — Holmes performs a veritable hatchet job on Cuvier — but what of the gazers who queued up by the thousands to catch a glimpse of the famous bottom? And why did aristocratic St. James’s Square and fashionable Piccadilly permit the likes of Cesars and Dunlop into the neighborhood?

Holmes suggests that the public’s obsession with Baartman coincided with the “new era of European imperialist expansion into the African interior, feminized by its would-be British colonizers as a continent ripe for conquest.” This would be a reasonable explanation, except for the fact that it is off by several decades. Africa was still the white man’s grave when Baartman arrived on the scene. Had the history of Britain been more broadly told, “African Queen” would be a better book, and the woman and curiosity that was the Hottentot Venus would be much plainer to see.

Readers’ Opinions

Forum: Book News and Reviews

Caroline Elkins is the Hugo K. Foster associate professor of African studies at Harvard and the author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning book “Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain’s Gulag in Kenya.”

30 January 2007

you know, i really think this speaks for itself

29 January 2007

talk amongst yourselves



Is this creepy or hilariously dead-on? I can't really decide, and usually I think this artist, 14, is very funny. And the celebrity-colored-child-adoption stuff is annoying. But does it take on a different meaning in the context of Lil' Kim's portrait by David LaChapelle (a.k.a. the nouveau Jean-Paul Goude, a moniker of which he'd no doubt be proud)?

And what of Kim's photo, and what to make of Ifétayo Abdus-Salam's take on it, from her American Exotic series:

a reminder of how it is in this great land of freedom

A lawyer posted this to a listserv I'm on:

[...]Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination by covered employers on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.[...] But, sexual orientation discrimination is absent from Title VII's list of bases upon which an employer cannot discriminate. This means that people can call homosexuals whatever they want all the day long in the workplace with impunity. Employers can also fire gay people for being gay without violating the law. (An aside: I fully acknowledge that certain states and municipalities around the country have legal protections for sex orientation minorities. But, these are painfully few. It's still accurate to say that in most places in the United States there are no legal protections for people against discrimination based upon sexual orientation.) Even as I write this, I shudder to think about all the ways one can openly and blatantly injure gay people: deprive them of property, take away their children, invalidate their relationships, just to name a few. I'm willing to argue that it is more difficult to do the same stuff to black people these days, if only because the laws of our country at least recognize the concept of defending racial minorities.

congrats


Caran Hartsfield, Tomoko Kana, Lucia Cedron, and Dagur Kari at the Sundance/NHK awards ceremony on Thursday in Park City. Photo by Brian Brooks/indieWIRE

by Eugene Hernandez and Brian Brooks/indieWIRE (January 25, 2007)

At a late afternoon reception on Thursday, the Sundance Institute and NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation) announced the four winners of the 2007 Sundance/NHK International Filmmakers Awards, selected by an international jury from 12 finalists. The winning filmmakers and projects are: Lucia Cedron for "Agnus Dei" from Latin America; Caran Hartsfield for "Bury Me Standing" from the United States; Tomoko Kana for "Two By The River" from Japan; and Dagur Kari for "The Good Heart" from Europe.

These annual awards were created eleven years ago to "honor and support visionary film directors from four global regions (Europe, Latin America, the United States, and Japan) in realizing their next projects." Each director receives a $10,000 award as well as a guarantee from NHK to purchase the Japanese TV broadcast rights upon completion of their film. Sundance staff will work closely with the recipients throughout the year to provide support and assistance. This year's honorees will be presented their prizes at the Sundance Film Festival awards ceremony on Saturday night.

"Agnus Dei" (Argentina) is a drama about a woman's grandfather who is kidnapped for ransom during the crime wave that took place during Argentina's economic crisis of 2002, while "The Good Heart" (Iceland) follows the story of an ailing bar owner and a young man recovering from a suicide attempt who become friends during their stay in hospital. "Two By The River" (Japan) is the story of an elderly man who has an increasingly hard time caring for his infirm wife until finally, with only memories of their life together to offer solace, he feels compelled to make a very difficult choice. And, "Bury Me Standing" (USA) centers on a random act of violence that triggers a change within a bizarre family dynamic, as each member re-examines the ignored, the hidden and the things left unsaid.

"Our winners' projects represent incredibly unique work by filmmakers from around the world and we are especially proud to be supporting three extraordinary women directors among them this year," commented Alesia Weston, associate director of the Feature Film Program, International in a statement. Michelle Satter, director, Sundance Institute Feature Film Program added, "The Sundance/ NHK award is part of the Sundance Institute's Feature Film Program which provides year-round creative and strategic support to U.S. and international filmmakers. We are thrilled by the vision and diversity of the winning directors." [Brian Brooks]

26 January 2007

fly indeed!

Yesterday, bored (and procrastinating) I discovered another new blog via fashion nette-work:

fly






I haven't been this inspired since discovering The Sartorialist many months ago--I sat and read it back to the beginning (thankfully it's only 6 months old). The designer/illustrator/artist, Andrea, is ridiculously talented and has terrific taste. Her wonderful designs reminded me that I have to get going on my publishing project. I'd love to be able to hire her!

25 January 2007

see this show


http://www.halfasian.us/

Front Gallery, Oakland
Gallery Hours:
Tuesday 11am-5pm, Wednesday, 11am-5pm,
Friday 1pm-6pm, Saturday, 1pm-4pm

First Fridays of the month, 1 pm-10pm

Phone: 510-444-1900
Email: info@frontgalleryoakland.com
35 Grand Ave, Oakland, CA 94612 (map)

You can click here to download Ben's essay, which was published in the Fall 2006 exposure (which I edit).

23 January 2007

is he still on that "voluptuous child-woman" nonsense?

















I suppose that's better than the

"primitive voluptuous girl-horse"[i]

he saw in Toukie Smith.

[i] Jean-Paul Goude, Jungle Fever, New York: Xavier Moreau (1981), 41.


19 January 2007

i rarely drive these days, but this is brilliant

i'll give him dreamgirls, but can't eddie murphy be stopped?

all kinds of wrong

why art is stupid

January 19, 2007 -- THE New York art world has gone gaga over Los Angeles-based Terence Koh, who came out of British Columbia calling himself "asianpunkboy." Koh opened his show at the Whitney Museum last night with a two-minute performance involving blinding lights, fog machines and a dangerous costume made of glass. Guests were ordered to wear white. The night before, guests were advised to wear gold to the dinner party art dealer Mary Boone threw for Koh at Mr. Chow. Koh made a grand entrance in a gold kimono for such guests as Bianca Jagger, Jane Holzer, Beth DeWoody, Ingrid Sischy and all three artists featured on the recent cover of New York magazine - Dash Snow, Dan Colen and Ryan McGinley.

seriously?

MADRID, Jan 19 (Reuters Life!) - A Colombian woman called Darling has been told she cannot become a Spanish citizen because her name is unacceptable.

Years of waiting to obtain Spanish citizenship for Darling Velez, 33, appeared to end with success a few months ago when her application was accepted, but she was shocked when the public registry rejected her name, El Mundo newspaper said on Friday.

Spanish law prohibits names which could expose a person to ridicule or do not clearly indicate gender. Without registering her name, Velez cannot become a citizen.

The registry office suggested Velez, who lives near Madrid, should choose a saint's name. But she said she wanted to stay Darling.

"My name is part of my personality. If they force me to change it, I'll change it to a Basque name and see what they say then," she said.

Names in Spain's minority Basque language were prohibited for many years during the dictatorship of Gen. Francisco Franco but now are common.

17 January 2007

Whitney Leigh strikes again!

(from Simone Leigh)

Whitney was interviewed on Fox News Hannity show January 11. So strange
this is. But I'm so proud of the guy. He's defending Yale students who were
attacked in San Francisco on New Year's Eve. It seems to be a bias crime.
Last night on the show they tried to make this assault about patriotism
and Whitney did at least set him straight on that.(see below)

HANNITY: This breaks my heart. You're a young man. You achieved so much
in your life. You're doing something really wonderful. And you know, I
want to get these people that did this to you, and I hope — working
with your attorney and the detectives out there that we're able to find
them.

I'll tell you what I'm going to do. I'm going to offer a $10,000 reward
for anybody that will come and testify that as a witness to this, to
help get these people — you know, America is still a country where you
can sing the national anthem and not be attacked viciously like this,
and cruelly like this......

LEIGH: Yes, I want to say this. You're right, this is truly a brutal
attack, but it's really senseless. This is not necessarily something
directed at "The Star Spangled Banner". What we had was a group of
thugs who within minutes could call out 19 people who would, just on a
whim, come out and brutally attack multiple people. This is a serious
gang. And there are several violent people still on the streets of San
Francisco.

You can see the video or read the full interview at this link:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,243318,00.html

craziness

(01-17) 13:28 PST SAN FRANCISCO -- It was a winter wonderland out there in some areas overnight, including downtown San Francisco, one of several cities that got a dusting of snow in the early morning hours.

ummm, no

You can't make this stuff up, people.

From Jasmyne Cannick's blog (she's got all kinds of links and contact info for protesting his upcoming "performance"at the lesbian-owned The Factory in West Hollywood):


As reported before, Charles Knipp is a white man who performs racially offensive material in drag and blackface. He describes his character Shirley Q. Liquor as an “inarticulate black welfare mother with 19 children.” While in blackface as Liquor, Knipp speaks in Ebonics and makes comments like “axe your mamma how she durrin” and misuses words like “ignunt.”


Oddly, RuPaul is reportedly a fan. Shame, RuPaul. I had heard about this person before but her post is so well-detailed it's worth checking out.

"5 Thing You May Not Know About Me"

Okay, so I've never been "tagged" by a reader, I'm not really hip to the whole "tagging" phenomenon, actually, but on a couple of sites I read recently the blogger had been tagged with the "5 Thing You May Not Know About Me" question, and since one of them wrote "Be tagged if you feel tagged," I'm going to go ahead and tag myself and answer these (and because my friend Nita wrote months ago that I never include anything personal on my blog anymore, which is probably true). Though, granted, some folks will know some of these things about me.

1. I hate looking at art in a museum or gallery. Maybe because I used to work in museums, maybe because I like to sit and/or sip a latte while looking at art, but I only really like art in reproduction, preferably a book. I'll go look at art maybe, maybe twice a year. If I'm dragged.

2. I have an intense loathing for people who walk up and down escalators. You know who you are. Maybe not such a secret since I've blogged about this before. This has developed from living in San Francisco and taking BART every day. Hands down the worst part of living in this city. And yes, I do realize that as transgressions go this isn't exactly akin to, I don't know, voting Republican, but I simmer with rage nonetheless.

3. I love the character of Skillet on Sanford and Son. I think he only appears in 5 episodes. Always with Leroy (Leroy [Leroy Daniels] & Skillet [Ernest Mayhand] were a comedy duo). Sure, if you watch one of his episodes, you won't understand why. I can't explain why. But he's perfect (though Leroy was a much better dancer). That's him on the left.



4. I love the taste of communion wafers (it's a Catholic thing). Love them. They're almost worth going to church for. I wish I knew where you could get them (unconsecrated, of course).

5. Worst chore in the house is dishwashing. I'd sooner let them pile up and just not enter the kitchen for a few days than wash them. This does not make me popular at home.

Likewise, if you're reading this and are a blogger, consider yourself tagged.

16 January 2007

inaugural ACRAH newsletter

GRAPEVINE I.1.doc

ACRAH stands for the Association of Critical Race Art Historians (formerly The Black Art & Visual Culture Research Society [BAVCRS]) and additional information about the name change is inside. The newsletter will replace email messages and will be issued quarterly. The inaugural issue of the newsletter, The Grapevine, is attached above as a MSWord file.

For questions, problems with downloading the newsletter, to be removed from, or included in the mailing list, please send an email to camara.holloway+acrah@gmail.com

11 January 2007

“Josephine Baker: Image and Icon”, National Portrait Gallery

“Josephine Baker: Image and Icon”
November 24, 2006 through March 18, 2007

Josephine Baker This exhibition traces Josephine Baker’s important and innovative contribution to the Jazz Age through vintage photographs, posters, drawings, prints and paintings. In celebration of the 100th anniversary of Baker’s birth, the exhibition explores the development of her image, first as an exotic phenomenon in a mid-1920s Paris that was infatuated with African-American culture, then as a glamorous cabaret star and finally as a Civil Rights advocate for a world without ethnic and racial barriers.

This exhibition is organized by Sheldon Art Galleries, St. Louis.

View online feature
Read a brief introduction

Labels:

10 January 2007

i love this reviewer, whose name i can't find

(thanks to Kristine for the link)

The Caucasian crusader rides again in 'Blood Diamond'

January 10, 2007

In Blood Diamond, Leonardo DiCaprio plays the latest in a long line of Caucasian crusaders fighting for black folk.

Hollywood rescue . . .Leonardo DiCaprio and Djimon Hounsou in Blood Diamond.

Hollywood rescue . . .Leonardo DiCaprio and Djimon Hounsou in Blood Diamond.


Eighteen years years ago, Edward Zwick made the lauded film Glory, in which a ragtag group of feisty young black men are whipped into shape by a white guy played by the actor who brought Ferris Bueller to life - with help from the white guy who once played the Princess Bride's boyfriend, the Princess Groom.

Last year, James Gartner made a lauded film called Glory Road, in which a ragtag group of feisty young black men are whipped into shape by a white guy played by an actor most famous for helping his fellow shipwreckees escape from the capsized ocean liner in Poseidon.

Now Zwick is back with a film in which a feisty but hapless black guy is whipped into shape by a white guy played by an actor who achieved fame by playing a mentally handicapped boy in What's Eating Gilbert Grape? If there is anything black people have learnt from Hollywood it's that no matter how bleak the situation seems, they can always rely on some resourceful, charis­matic and, in some instances, shapely white person to bail them out.

The film in question is the exciting but characteristically idiotic Blood Diamond, in which Leonardo DiCaprio is a ruthless smuggler who specialises in spiriting precious stones out of those war-torn nations whose diamonds the G8 nations have promised not to buy as the profits are used to do bad things. They are called "conflict diamonds".

While serving a shockingly brief stint in a Sierra Leone prison for violating that nation's contraband smuggling rules, DiCaprio happens upon the information that a fellow prisoner (Djimon Hounsou) has hidden a priceless pink diamond on a river bank somewhere in the hinterland while enslaved by the thoroughly revolting rebels who have also turned his 11-year-old son into a murderer.

Vicious, corrupt, armed and dangerous, DiCaprio is the protege of a South African mercenary and diamond merchant, played by the vengeful 5000-year-old pharaonic aide-de-camp who comes back to life in The Mummy and makes things miserable for everybody.

Thoroughly unprincipled, handy with firearms, brandishing the most flamboyant accent to grace the silver screen in decades and not particularly nice, the stone-free DiCaprio does not initially look like the white man who will help Hounsou find his son, escape from Sierra Leone, bring corrupt white diamond merchants to justice and live happily ever after. No, that role would seem to fall to the radiant Jennifer Connelly, here playing an American journalist determined to make the world safe for democracy - if not through her literary skills, then by transfixing an entire continent with her Children of the Corn stare and putting them all to sleep in a kind of hypnotically induced ceasefire.

As was the case in Requiem for a Dream, Pollock, A Beautiful Mind, House of Sand and Fog, The Hulk and Dark Water, Connelly's mere presence in a film guarantees that things will turn out badly for the male lead, as Connelly is always cast as the Angel of Death. Fun to hang out with, great eyes, amazing eyebrows ... but the Angel of Death.

Despite Connelly's beatific stature as the White Journalist Who Cares - and Cares Deeply, she gradually finds her role as the anointed one filched from right under her by the morally born-again DiCaprio. For, as the film proceeds, and as more and more horrible black rebels kill off horrible black soldiers representing the horrible black regime - every black person in the film is either a victim or a monster - DiCaprio gradually comes to realise there are more important things in life than money, that ebony needs ivory, that diamonds are not forever.

Zwick would thus have us believe that in a society ravaged by a murderous civil war, where black children are routinely kidnapped and induced to murder other black children after being shot up with heroin purchased with conflict diamonds from horrible white people from out of town, the man who will ultimately bring the villains to justice is a formally depraved mercenary who now prefers justice and racial harmony to wealth. Hmmm, say I to Mr Zwick. Hmmm!

Blood Diamond joins a growing body of films set in Africa in which good vanquishes evil because ­morally upstanding white folks ultimately triumph over truly satanic white folks. Meanwhile, the entire black African population kind of takes a back seat and watches the honkies duke it out.

For example, in The Constant Gardener Rachel Weisz plays an incorruptible white woman who is murdered by a gang of racially mixed thugs in the employ of thoroughly evil white man Bill Nighy, all because she has stumbled upon damning proof that white-owned pharmaceutical companies have been secretly using ordinary black people as guinea pigs in their perfidious experiments. Bad white people! Bad! But, by the end of the film, the very wicked, very white Nighy will be packed off to the calaboose thanks to the efforts of the very saintly and even more pasty-faced Ralph Fiennes, who lays down his own life for the benefit of impoverished black Africans.

Hard-done-by Africans also get a surprising helping hand from white folks in The Interpreter, in which Nicole Kidman plays an African-born translator who ­accidentally discovers that perfidious black men are planning an assassination involving black men who are not nearly as perfidious. She can do this because she is in the wrong place at the right time and because the men are speaking in an obscure language that only two white people on the entire planet have mastered: Nicole Kidman and David Attenborough.

These films derive directly from such motion pictures as A Dry White Season and Cry, the Beloved Country, where the evil that white men do gets swept under the rug by the good that other white men do. In all the same message comes through: yes, some white people are bad. Oh, so very, very bad! But when white people are good, well, nobody does it better.

The template for the Up With Caucasians! film was established in 1962 with the release of Robert Mulligan's preposterously over­rated To Kill a Mockingbird. Based on a beloved, fabulously successful, thoroughly absurd novel by Harper Lee, who never wrote another book, To Kill a Mockingbird tells the story of two white children living in the Deep South in the 1930s who gradually come to realise what a ­heroic figure their father cuts after he courageously defends a black man accused of raping a white woman.

The self-congratulatory motion picture was released at a time when black men were still being lynched in the South. Bob Dylan even wrote a song about it. Pioneeringly foolish, To Kill a Mockingbird establishes the basic theme of all Three Cheers for Whitey! movies: yes, there are many bad white people out there who do some terrible, terrible things to black people. But when the chips are down and black people are poised on the very precipice of disaster, they can always rely on some thoroughly decent white folks to step in and make sure that justice prevails.

This is the spirit that animates films as varied as Mississippi Burning, where Gene Hackman plays an FBI agent who helps bring murderous Klansmen to justice, and A Time to Kill, a typically knuckleheaded Joel Schumacher offering starring Matthew McConaughey and Sandra Bullock as crusading white folks who will do anything to ensure that Samuel L. Jackson gets justice in the Deep South. For that matter, it is the theme of Glory Road, a film about an all-black basketball team that beat an all-white basketball team for the 1966 collegiate basketball championship in a truly legendary, watershed contest that changed American society forever and whose star is the very white Josh Lucas, who plays the black athletes' coach. This is like making a movie about heavyweight boxers in the late 20th century where the champion is a short white guy from south Philadelphia. Who would buy a premise like that?

Given the very nature of the industry - movies are driven by stars, and most stars tend to be good-looking white people - it is hardly surprising that so many motion pictures celebrating truly wonderful white folks should hit the screens. Still, I don't know how black people can stand this stuff. In fact, I don't know how Japanese people can stand it. Zwick, who seems to specialise in historically improbable multi­cultural films, also made the hilarious The Last Samurai, starring Tom Cruise as a pistol-packin' mercenary who does everything he can to preserve Japan's rapidly dying samurai tradition from the encroachments of rifle-bearing locals on the payroll of avaricious Westerners.

In Blood Diamond, Zwick is back to his old tricks. Yes, those darned Caucasians are stirring up trouble in west Africa by illicitly trafficking in conflict diamonds. And that's making life hard for innocent black people, even though the nastiest villains in the film are blacks. But once a couple of gifted, determined white folks arrive on the scene, you can rest assured that the grapes of wrath will get trampled in the Lord's vineyard with the help of DiCaprio's terrible swift sword, Luger, AK-47, whatever. To hear Connelly tell it, this whole damn war would come to a screeching halt if only white men back in Beverly Hills would stop buying conflict diamonds for their trashy girlfriends.

"People back home wouldn't buy a diamond ring if they knew it had cost someone a hand," Connelly says. Says who?

05 January 2007

a challenge worth meeting

I happened to be watching CBS’ Sunday Morning
last Sunday – the show was doing a segment on
Wikipedia, the online free encyclopaedia where
the entries are all written and edited by
volunteers. The segment went on to show a
Wikipedia convention.

All the attendees – that I saw— were white, which
left me to wonder.

Later that day I decided to do a random search on
Wikipedia. I started with the obscure: Black
dancer Lottie “The Body” Graves, featured in the
film Standing in the Shadows of Motown. There was
an oblique reference to her but no listing. Then
I tried Raven Wilkinson – one of the first Black
ballerinas. I got nothing. I tried choreographer
John Alleyne – nothing. I tried Jeni LeGon, the
first Black tap dancer to get a film contract.
Nothing.

This is NOT a good sign.

Now of course my area is dance so I have a bias.
But I wonder about Black scientists, Olympians,
innovators – are they being represented and if
so, is the data accurate or complete?

Thus I am emailing you – my friends and
colleagues – asking you to join me in getting
Wikipedia up to date and up to scratch.
Personally, I am committed to editing the Ballet
and Dance sections and inserting/ the following
in early 2007:

Lottie “the Body” Graves
Raven Wilkinson
Jeni LeGon
Janet Collins
Marion Cuyjet
Kevin Pugh
John Alleyne

While many rightly question the validity of
Wikipedia as a resource, the fact remains it *is*
being used as one. Therefore the participation
of the Black community (communities) – is
important.

It is my hope that you will join me in this
project. Getting the word out is important so
feel free to post my letter (or make reference to
it) on your websites and blogs. Write an article
for wikipedia or request that one be written.
Check the subject headings and key word searches
- we may have articles that are simply not linked
correctly.

Wikipedia may be found at
http://www.wikipedia.org/ and I may be reached
at ms_m2you@yahoo.ca or at
kristine@kristinemaitland.com

Sincerely

Kristine Maitland
http://www.kmaitland.ca
Black history: ballet, burlesque and beyond

http://kristinemaitland.blogspot.com
Yeah, but that would make sense. (my blog).
Voting is now open for "People and Portraits!"
For release 01/05/2007

December saw the debut of our monthly photo contest at The CameraArts Blog, Photos of the Month: “People and Portraits.” Now that the finalists have been chosen, all of our readers are invited to participate in the selection process. Voting has already started today, and will continue for a week until noon on January 12, 2007. The voting page will be posted at CameraArts.com. Thumbnails of all entries will be displayed, as well as links to flickr, where all contest finalists have been displayed during the month of December 2006.

Every week during December, dozens of entries were received, but only five were chosen for display on flickr. 20 finalists were chosen, and their images are up for review, to be juried by the public. Even though the subject, “People and Portraits,” was specific enough, the contest was open to interpretation, and we received a wide range of submissions. We have attempted to present as wide and diverse selection of photography as possible, from all types of photographers and every experience level. Our chosen images encompass family photographs, fine art and abstract pieces, even high fashion. Everyone who participated should be assured that the CameraArts staff had some TOUGH decisions to make when it came to selecting entries!

We invite everyone to enter our next contest, already underway at The CameraArts Blog. The subject is "Architecture." All who have entered the December 2006 contest are invited to enter again. Send all entries (jpegs only, please) to tgibbons@cameraarts.com, along with your full name, image title, and medium used. One image per person, per category, please. As always, if you have any questions, contact us.

Rules and Guidelines:
• Submissions: January 2007’s topic is "Architecture." This theme is, as in all of our future contests, open to interpretation. Low-res (75-100 dpi) jpegs only, please. Contest winners from previous months are not eligible. We accept entries from absolutely anyone over 18, regardless of expertise level, equipment used, or aesthetic perspective. An entry is eligible as long as it incorporates mostly photographic elements.

Please email tgibbons@cameraarts.com with your entry, along with your full name, title, and medium used. Only one submission per person, per category, please.

• Judging: The best five submissions will be chosen by the CameraArts staff and posted on The CameraArts Blog (and collected on Flickr) every Monday through the end of the month, after which the voting process will begin. Our prestigious jury consists of none other than our own readers at The CameraArts Blog, FRAMES, and CameraArts.com. Only one vote will be accepted per person, per category.

• Awards: Three photographers who receive the most votes will receive a free one-year subscription to CameraArts Magazine. If you already have a subscription, simply add the 6 issues for no cost.

• Fee: There is no fee, so stop freakin' out.

• Copyright info: We will watermark all images, so please do not place copyright directly on the image. All pertinent information should be included in your email. Applying for the contest implies permission for CameraArts to display submissions on Flickr, The CameraArts Blog, and CameraArts.com. CameraArts will have copyright on all submissions, as they appear on these pages. Applicants will retain all private rights to their images. While they are displayed on Flickr, your image will not be available for reproduction or download to anyone outside of CameraArts or The CameraArts Blog.

All images will be watermarked "©CA/(photographer's name)." If you do not wish for your submission to remain on flickr when the contest has ended, email me and I will take it down. Additional categories for future contests will be posted on our website soon. There's no reason not to give us your best shot!

About CameraArts Magazine

CameraArts magazine has been in publication for almost ten years and has continued to feature new and up-and-coming photographers, as well as contemporary giants and legends of the craft. We specialize in small- and medium-format fine art photography without regard to how the image was created. The picture is the bottom line.

ASMA AHMED SHIKOH

Solo Exhibition - "Liberated"
January 2 -- January 27, 2007
Opening Reception: Sat, January 6th, 2007, 2-4 pm

(Gallery will be updated after the show)

"Shikoh’s new work reflects her belief in the self empowering identity of American Muslim women. The artist creates an exciting visual interplay of popular icons and the ‘hijab’ (the head scarf adorned by Muslim women), highlighting the role of individual practices in the shaping of a unique national identity. The work includes personal involvement of more than a hundred Muslim women across America."



Ceres Gallery
547 West 27th Street
Suite 201
New York, NY 10001
phone and fax: 212-947-6100
email: art@ceresgallery.org
Hours: Tuesday - Saturday 12-6
http://www.ceresgallery.org

theHotness Issue 16

(this is from November but I got it a month ago...)

Hot.Grrrls: WANGECHI MUTU & MICKALENE THOMAS

BRINGIN' SEXY BACK TO THE ARTWORLD

If I were to believe Biggie or even the now defunct NRG Magazine, Brooklyn girls supposedly got it going on. And if last night's sojourn from the Heights to Bed Stuy proved anything it was just that—that like the sprawling terrain itself, the grrrls too are mad deep. First stop was this Stoop Series co-presented by BRIC's Rotunda Gallery, which I had never heard of and NY Magazine. I've been on NY Mag's guest list for events for almost two years now and I don't remember them ever doing anything in Brooklyn and surely nothing that centered around the work of not one, but two Black women. So needless to say I was looking forward to this event that featured a conversation with artists Wangechi Mutu and Mickalene Thomas. I met Wangechi a year ago at a birthday party and ever since I've been hearing things (mostly good) about her seemingly everywhere so I was especially amped to see if she lived up to the hype. I has seen her work up close at this reception given for the President of Liberia at the Nubian Heritage and though it was aight. Honestly I wasn't really moved by her work until last night when this Kenyan homegrrrl started breaking down the symbolism and metaphors that define her collage. I was totally in awe as she talked about her creative process and how that is fueled by African history, sexism and sexuality, race and politics. She was saying things like...

read on